David Grusch 2023: the UAP whistleblower before Congress

David Charles Grusch is an American military intelligence officer, lieutenant colonel in the USAF. He served in the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). Beginning in 2019, he was designated as the NRO representative on the UAP Task Force (UAPTF) — the interagency group created to coordinate the investigation of unidentified aerial phenomena.

In 2021, he transferred to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) as coordinator. He leaves the government in April 2023. His complaint to the Inspector General of Intelligence (ICIG) was filed before his departure and deemed “credible and urgent” by this office — a precise legal qualification that triggers the obligation to brief Congress.

Grusch claims to have been informed by dozens of colleagues and sources within the intelligence apparatus of the existence of secret U.S. government programs intended to recover, analyze and conceal materials and devices of "non-human origin."

He states that non-human beings have been found associated with some of these devices. He refused to elaborate in public session, citing the classified nature of the information.

He claims he himself suffered professional retaliation for filing his complaint, and cites several colleagues who were intimidated or hurt for wanting to speak out.

“I can say categorically, without any ambiguity, that this is a matter of fact, a special access program of which I have personal knowledge, which involves activities not disclosed to Congress.”

— David Grusch, July 26, 2023 hearing, congress.gov transcript

The Pentagon and AARO responded with official denials. The DoD spokesperson said no non-human materials recovery program existed to his knowledge. The AARO FY2024 report explicitly states that it investigated the allegations and found no corroboration.

It should be noted that the legal credibility of the complaint (deemed “credible and urgent” by the ICIG) concerns the legal admissibility of the whistleblower process — not the veracity of the claims on the merits. An inspector general can judge a complaint legally admissible without validating its content.

The testimony of David Grusch is a major institutional event: a confirmed intelligence officer, benefiting from clearances at the highest level, testifies under oath before the American Congress on the alleged existence of secret programs linked to the UAP. This makes it an important primary document in the history of this debate.

This is not proof. It is a statement — made under oath, by someone with professional reason to know what they are talking about, but whose central assertions are not corroborated by any document or physical evidence made public to date.

UFO VIDEO does not validate Grusch's claims. We document the fact that he made them, the context in which he made them, and the elements that allow them to be contextualized.

→ Additional files: Pilot testimonies under oath · AARO FY2024 Report · Trump and the 2026 UAPs